Despite all evidence that the now-defunct Egyptian National Democratic Party, the ruling party during the Mubarak Era, was little more than the polite face of the dictatorship, the NDP became a member of the Socialist International in June 1989, at the XVIII Congress held in Stockholm. The Socialist International has ingenious reasons why it ever allowed admission to a sockpuppet party of a gang of murderers and thieves hell-bent on stealing every last thing not nailed down in Egypt:
This decision was based upon the desire of the Socialist International to build a partnership with your organisation in the search for peace and security in that region of the world, so crucial to global stability. The International, as a movement for peace, recognised in this decision the will of the NDP and its leadership to sincerely engage in this quest, as has indeed been evident over the last thirty years.
Along with this, the Socialist International wanted to encourage the development of multi-party democracy in Egypt by expanding relationships in that part of the world, as democracy is for our movement a fundamental pillar upon which to secure the rights and freedoms of our citizens and to achieve social and economic progress.
So, let us get this right: the Socialist International will let any gang of crooks and thugs join just in case they mouth words of peace and love towards others. The reference to “the will of the NDP and its leadership to sincerely engage in this quest, as has indeed been evident over the last thirty years” is telling. The phrase is drawn from the SI‘s letter of January 2011 to the General Secretary of Mubarak’s vanity party, informing him of the SI decision to expel the NDP from the International. Readers will, of course, notice that 30 years is exactly the amount of time Mubarak was in office. Even in expelling the NDP, SI could not help praise the old crook, Mubarak himself!
If that was not insulting enough for the millions of ordinary Egyptians who had to live under the repression and fraud of the previous 30 years of Mubarak’s rule, SI goes on to sing the praises of the utterly false and superficial “democratic” changes that seemingly occurred under Mubarak’s rule. Whilst fretting over the lack of progress to introduce adequate democratic features to Egyptian society, SI found it within their hearts to comment on:
the hopeful moments which had arisen during the 80s and led to membership of the NDP in the SI and then again in the mid- 2000s when a measure of important internal changes had taken place within the NDP.
So, for SI one of the measures of increased democracy was that NDP officials were not overtly appointed by Mubarak and his clique after a while (well, actually, they were), but had to go through a show of “democracy” before taking up those sinecures and roles in the party apparatus of the NDP. Don’t you feel democracy is safe in the hands of the ever vigilent SI?
Even when SI got cold-feet about associating themselves with one of the most anti-democratic, corrupt and murderous regimes in the entire MENA region, their reasons for the expulsion of the Egyptian NDP were despicable:
The current massive calls being made today by the citizens of Egypt for freedoms and rights point to the dramatic failure of the Egyptian government to deliver to its people and to the failings of the NDP to live up to its promises. The use of violence, with scores dead and injured, is totally incompatible with the policies and principles of any social democratic party anywhere in the world.

A gathering of members of a fully functioning social democratic party
Failure of the government to deliver and failings of the NDP to live up to its promises? Are the SI right in their collective head? The NDP were the “party” of a narrow clique of technocrats, secret policemen and family friends and relations that surrounded the Mubarak clan. The promises made were to this gang of thugs, thieves and murderers – not to the Egyptian people – and on these promises the regime certainly delivered (quite a sizable share of Egypt’s GDP, in point of fact, straight into overseas accounts).
The final sentence of the above speaks volumes for the SI’s rank opportunism” SI had not noticed the use of violence, leaving scores dead and injured, on the part of the Mubarak dictatorship before the January Revolution? Presumably, then, despite all evidence from international human rights organisations, these acts of state terror were compatible with the policies and principles of social democracy?
I ask, because SI seemed quite happy to have the Egyptian NDP Mubarak Party as one of their fold whilst such things went on in Egypt as electoral fraud, massive corruption, illegal arrest and detention, Emergency Rule by the dictatorship, secret service surveillance of the population, dissappearing of political opponents… oh, you know, all the other things generally accepted as being out of kilter with the policies and principles of social democracy. Only when the People rose did the Socialist International change its mind and declare the NDP to be beyond the pale.
Having been caught in bed, snuggled up to a regional dictator, the Socialist International have been keen to distance themselves from the military junta in Egypt, although again in terms so vague that one wonders whether they are just going through the motions. Earlier this month (after remaining almost completely silent on Egypt for the previous months), SI roused itself to issue the following statement:
In response to the escalating crisis, Socialist International is deeply concerned by the situation in Egypt and condemns the repressive methods being used by the Egyptian ruling military against civilian protesters. We have been hoping, as have all Egyptians, to see a new democratic Egypt. As yet, this hope has not become a reality. We stand in solidarity with the Egyptian people who want a swift and peaceful transition to democracy. A fairly elected civilian government should be in place as soon as possible to enable Egypt to move forward as a fully-fledged democratic state.
The statement is full of the usual verbiage from SI about governments breaking promises and not delivering. At least they are siding with the demand that the SCAF junta should go; but given their previous craven support right up to the bitter end for the party of the Mubarak dictatorship, exactly how seriously should Egyptians take SI promises to deliver on anything?
Presently, there are no Egyptian parties that are members, full or otherwise, nor observers of the Socialist International. They cannot be blamed for that, surely.